Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,883 documents
Decision Content
PURPLE LUPINE, LLC V. SHERMAN & SHERMAN, P.C.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
PURPLE LUPINE, LLC, a New Mexico
Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SHERMAN & SHERMAN, P.C.,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
CITY OF DEMING, a Municipal Corporation
of the State of New Mexico, SOUTHWEST LOAN
& INVESTMENT CORP., SUNBELT ANDERSON OIL
COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, and MINNIE LUJAN,
if living, and if deceased, Minnie Lujan’s unknown heirs,
Defendants.
No. 35,258
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 28, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY, Henry R.
Quintero, District Judge
COUNSEL
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Jeannette Martinez Whittaker, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Sherman & Sherman, Jakub F. Sherman, Frederick H. Sherman, Deming, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Reversed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge