Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Peterson v. Baca

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/15/2016
Docket Numbers 35,105
Decision-maker(s) JONATHAN B. SUTIN; TIMOTHY L. GARCIA; J. MILES HANISEE
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Peterson v. Baca (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 09/15/2016
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

PETERSON V. BACA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

LORRAINE DELORES PETERSON,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
JULIANNA E. BACA,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 35,105

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 15, 2016


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Sommer, Udall, Hardwick, Ahern & Hyatt, P.A., Kurt A. Sommer, Joseph P. Walsh, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Julianna E. Baca, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       AFFIRMED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

WE CONCUR:

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.