Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Ocampo v. Galindo

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 01/26/2010
Docket Numbers 29,887
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; JAMES J. WECHSLER; LINDA M. VANZI
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Ocampo v. Galindo (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 01/26/2010
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

OCAMPO V. GALINDO

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

RAMIRO OCAMPO,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
MARIA GALINDO,
Respondent-Appellant.

NO. 29,887

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 26, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G. Shoobridge, District Judge

COUNSEL

Laura K. Castillo, Hobbs, NM, for Appellee

Glen L. Houston, Hobbs, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.