Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
NESBIT V. McCOY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DALE NESBIT and
PAMELA NESBIT,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JERRY McCOY,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 32,083
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
October 22, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY, J. Richard
Brown, District Judge
COUNSEL
Martin, Dugan & Martin, Lane T. Martin, Mark R. Horton, Carlsbad, NM, for Appellees
Jerry McCoy, Carlsbad, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge