Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
NELLIS V. MID-CENTURY INS. CO.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
NICOLE NELLIS, for herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 29,993
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 20, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Clay
Campbell, District Judge
COUNSEL
Myers, Oliver & Price, P.C., Floyd D. Wilson, Albuquerque, NM, Freedman, Boyd, Hollander, Goldberg, Ives & Duncan, P.A., David Freedman, Joseph Goldberg, Albuquerque, NM, Eaves & Mendenhall, P.A., John M. Eaves, Karen Mendenhall, Albuquerque, NM, Law Office of Alan Konrad, Alan Konrad, Albuquerque, NM, Peifer, Hanson & Mullins, P.A., Charles R. Peifer, Robert E. Hanson, Albuquerque, NM, Dennis M. McCary, Albuquerque, NM, Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP, Rachel Jensen, San Diego, CA, for Appellees
Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Andrew G. Schultz, Albuquerque, NM, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Christopher Chorba, Los Angeles, CA, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Darrel J. Hieber, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellants
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
AUTHOR:
DECISION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
This is the companion case to Nellis v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona, COA No. 29,295 decided today. The factual background here is identical to that in Farmers. Perhaps because this case was decided below by a different trial judge, the procedural posture is slightly different. However, we have determined that the differences do not materially affect the legal analysis in any way that would prevent our Opinion in Farmers from controlling the outcome here.
Therefore, relying on Farmers, we reverse and remand for dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge