Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Montes v. Johnson

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 02/29/2012
Docket Numbers 31,721
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; CYNTHIA A. FRY; RODERICK T. KENNEDY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Montes v. Johnson (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 02/29/2012
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

MONTES V. JOHNSON

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

MARIA L. VARGAS MONTES,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
HOWARD JOHNSON,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 31,721

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

February 29, 2012


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY, Daniel Viramontes, District Judge

COUNSEL

DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC, Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez, Deming, NM, for Appellee

Howard Johnson, Deming, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.