Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 101 documents
Decision Content
MENDOZA V. HUBER
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
GEORGE MENDOZA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LUCINDA HUBER,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 33,913
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 25, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Manuel
I. Arrieta, District Judge
COUNSEL
Kelly O’Connell, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant
The Pickett Law Firm, LLC, Stephen T. Swaim, Lawrence M. Pickett, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals from a district court judgment resolving Plaintiff’s quiet title complaint in Defendant’s favor. We issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss for lack of a final order. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge