Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Kimbrell v. Kimbrell

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 04/01/2011
Docket Numbers 30,680
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; CYNTHIA A. FRY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Kimbrell v. Kimbrell (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 04/01/2011
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,887 documents

Decision Content

KIMBRELL V. KIMBRELL

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

WILLIAM DAVID KIMBRELL,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LORRAINE KIMBRELL,
Respondent-Appellee.

NO. 30,680

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 1, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Barbara Vigil, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary W. Boyle, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

Sutin, Thayer & Browne, PC, Michael J. Golden, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.