Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
J. QUIRNO V. F. WILSON
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
JOSE E. CASTRO QUIRINO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FRANK WILSON, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 29,363
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 30, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY, Don
Maddox, District Judge
COUNSEL
Jose E. Castro Quirino, Clayton, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Rosner & Chavez, LLC, Frank N. Chavez, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellees Trujillo, Wilson, Martinez & Stevens
Marie Mattison, Alamogordo, NM, Pro Se Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge