Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Human Services Dep't v. Pekarcik

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 04/29/2011
Docket Numbers 30,744
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; TIMOTHY L. GARCIA
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Human Services Dep't v. Pekarcik (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 04/29/2011
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,887 documents

Decision Content

HUMAN SERVICES DEPT. V. PEKARCIK

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT
and ROBERTA PEKARCIK,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
PHILIP PEKARCIK,
Respondent-Appellant.

NO. 30,744

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 29, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

McDevitt Law Firm, P.A., Susan Schaefer McDevitt, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Philip Pekarcik, Los Lunas, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

REVERSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.