Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Hidalgo v. Krowl

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 04/29/2014
Docket Numbers 33,146
Decision-maker(s) RODERICK T. KENNEDY; MICHAEL E. VIGIL; J. MILES HANISEE
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Hidalgo v. Krowl (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 04/29/2014
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

HIDALGO V. KROWL

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

MELISSA MIREYA HIDALGO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAVID ISAAC KROWL,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 33,146

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 29, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Mary W. Rosner, District Judge

COUNSEL

Grace B. Duran, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee

David Isaac Krowl, Las Cruces, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, Chief Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       AFFIRMED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.