Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
HAUGHT V. SW CONVENIENCE STORES
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
CYNTHIA HAUGHT,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHWEST CONVENIENCE STORES, and
NEW MEXICO MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and
ST. PAUL/THE TRAVELERS,
Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
NO. 32,639
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 8, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Victor S. Lopez, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
James Rawley, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Miller Stratvert P.A., Timothy R. Briggs, Albuquerque, NM, Allen, Shepherd, Lewis, & Syra P.A., Kimberly A. Syra, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge