Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 101 documents
Decision Content
GREGORY V. MARR
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROBERT E. GREGORY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TERESA MARR,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 29,318
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 4, 2010
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Jerald
A. Valentine, District Judge
COUNSEL
Robert E. Gregory, El Paso, TX, Pro Se Appellant
Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A., Michael H. Harbour, Sean P. McAfee, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. We have received a memorandum in support from Appellee. Appellant has not filed any opposition to our proposed calendar notice, and the time for doing so has passed. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993). Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the decision of the district court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge