Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
GREEN V. CASA BELLA APARTMENTS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
WANDA GREEN, JOHN E. GREEN,
L. BALLARD, (minor child),
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CASA BELLA APARTMENTS
(a.k.a Plaza Dorado), THE NEIDERS
COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 34,393
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
October 6, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Alan
M. Malott, District Judge
COUNSEL
Derek V. Garcia, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
Ada B. Priest, Justin D. Goodman, Peter J. Eicker, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to reverse in part and affirm in part. We proposed to summarily reverse summary judgment as to (1) the negligence claim brought by Plaintiff minor child (grandchild of the tenants), who was separately named, and (2) the claim brought by the Greens Plaintiffs, the tenants, for the return of their security deposit. We proposed to summarily affirm summary judgment as to all the other claims the Greens Plaintiffs raised relative to their occupancy and lease, on the basis that the rescission was an effective waiver of those claims. No memorandum opposing summary reversal or summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} For the reasons set forth in the notice, summary judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part. We remand for further proceedings relative to the claim brought by Plaintiff minor child and the claim brought by the Greens Plaintiffs for return of their security deposit.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge