Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

E. Mayfield v. B. Tinker

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 01/26/2009
Docket Numbers 28,701
Decision-maker(s) CELIA FOY CASTILLO; CYNTHIA A. FRY; MICHAEL E. VIGIL
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - E. Mayfield v. B. Tinker (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 01/26/2009
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

E. MAYFIELD V. B. TINKER

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

EARL MAYFIELD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BILL T. TINKER,
Defendant-Appellee.

NO. 28,701

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 26, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Linda M. Vanzi, District Judge

COUNSEL

Earl Mayfield, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant

Bill T. Tinker, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellee

JUDGES

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

AUTHOR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.