Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
DAVIDSON V. KURUCZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
WILLIAM E. DAVIDSON and SHARYN N. DAVIDSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ROGER J. KURUCZ, individually, and as Trustee of
the ROGER J. KURUCZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST,
Defendant-Appellee.
NO. 29,586
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
October 19, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Ted
Baca, District Judge
COUNSEL
Albuquerque Advocates, P.C., Darryl W. Millet, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
Law Offices of Segal & Whittaker, LLP, Jeannette Martinez Whittaker, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge