Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
CABALLERO V. WAGGONER
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE
OF RAFAELA CABALLERO, Deceased,
CARLOS CABALLERO,
Petitioner/Cross
Respondent-Appellant,
v.
EVA WAGGONER,
Respondent/Cross
Petitioner-Appellee.
No. 31,381
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 15, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Carl
J. Butkus, District Judge
COUNSEL
R. Carlos Caballero, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Hurley, Toevs, Styles, Hamblin & Panter, PA, Gregory W. MacKenzie, Albuquerque, NM, Law Offices of Marcus E. Garcia, Marcus E. Garcia, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge