Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
BUDDEN V. TARGET CORP.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ILIANA BUDDEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION, f/k/a DAYTON
HUDSON CORPORATION, and MICHAEL
DE RUITER ZYLKER,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. A-1-CA-36486
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 21, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, C.
Shannon Bacon, District Judge
COUNSEL
Wray & Girard P.C., Katherine Wray, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard, & Smith, LLP, Josh A. Harris, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge