Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Bransford-Wakefield v. Wakefield

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 02/06/2013
Docket Numbers 32,400
Decision-maker(s) CYNTHIA A. FRY; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; LINDA M. VANZI
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Bransford-Wakefield v. Wakefield (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 02/06/2013
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,887 documents

Decision Content

BRANSFORD-WAKEFIELD V. WAKEFIELD

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DEBORAH BRANSFORD-WAKEFIELD,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOEL C. WAKEFIELD,
Defendants-Appellant.

No. 32,400

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

February 6, 2013


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge

COUNSEL

Beatrice Castellano Lockhart, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Joel C. Wakefield, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.