Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,883 documents
Decision Content
BISHOP V. LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DONALD RAY BISHOP,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT 1, JOHN DOE I,
LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT 2, JOHN DOE II,
LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT 3, JOHN DOE III,
LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT 4, JOHN DOE IV,
LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT 5, JOHN DOE V,
Respondents-Appellees.
NO. 32,597
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 23, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G.
W. Shoobridge, District Judge
COUNSEL
Donald Ray Bishop, Las Cruces, NM, Pro se Appellant
Maddox, Holloman & Kirksey, P.C., Lee A. Kirksey, Hobbs, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge