Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
BACA V. KARSTEN HOMES
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MELINDA BACA,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
KARSTEN HOMES and
FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO.,
Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
No. 29,727
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 21, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Chavez Law Offices, Gene N. Chavez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Doughty & West, Judd C. West, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Bustamante, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge