Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Aztec v. N. Gonzales

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 05/20/2009
Docket Numbers 28,739
Decision-maker(s) JONATHAN B. SUTIN; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; RODERICK T. KENNEDY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Aztec v. N. Gonzales (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 05/20/2009
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

AZTEC V. N GONZALES

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

CITY OF AZTEC, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
NORA GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 28,739

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

May 20, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Sandra A. Price, District Judge.

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee.

Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant.

JUDGES

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

AUTHOR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

            Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

            REVERSED.

            IT IS SO ORDERED.

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.