Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Acosta v. John Hendrix Corp.

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 06/16/2010
Docket Numbers 30,003
Decision-maker(s) CYNTHIA A. FRY; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; CELIA FOY CASTILLO
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Acosta v. John Hendrix Corp. (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 06/16/2010
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

ACOSTA V. JOHN HENDRIX CORP.

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

MARTIAS ACOSTA and
MARIA ACOSTA,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JOHN H. HENDRIX CORPORATION and
TOMMY CARRUTH,
Defendants-Appellants.

NO. 30,003

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

June 16, 2010


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G. Shoobridge, District Judge

COUNSEL

Trenchard & Hoskins, Robert Trenchard, Jr., Paul G. Tellez, El Paso, TX, for Appellees

Hinkle, Hensley, Shanor & Martin, L.L.P., Richard E. Olson, Lucas M. Williams, Roswell, NM, for Appellants

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.